<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>STEM Ed+ Commons | Chris A. Kramer | Activity</title>
	<link>https://stemedplus.hcommons.org/members/frodothegnome/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://stemedplus.hcommons.org/members/frodothegnome/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Chris A. Kramer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 11:08:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=10.6.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b70bc657945c1727b9f350508bb1d1f5</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited RELIGION TODAY, A CRITICAL THINKING APPROACH TO RELIGIOUS STUDIES in the group Public Philosophy Journal</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1901606/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 03:00:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RELIGION TODAY (2nd edition) offers a refreshing introduction to the academic study of religion with a particular emphasis on critically informed analysis. The book skillfully explores diverse religious traditions and phenomena, providing readers with a comprehensive overview that encourages them to engage critically with the subject and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1901606"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1901606/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a4b79933484947adfab62f64bee2131f</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited RELIGION TODAY, A CRITICAL THINKING APPROACH TO RELIGIOUS STUDIES in the group Philosophy of Religion</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1901605/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2024 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RELIGION TODAY (2nd edition) offers a refreshing introduction to the academic study of religion with a particular emphasis on critically informed analysis. The book skillfully explores diverse religious traditions and phenomena, providing readers with a comprehensive overview that encourages them to engage critically with the subject and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1901605"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1901605/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a9001c71b41257bcf48dde7aead6f842</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited RELIGION TODAY, A CRITICAL THINKING APPROACH TO RELIGIOUS STUDIES</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1901568/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:22:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RELIGION TODAY (2nd edition) offers a refreshing introduction to the academic study of religion with a particular emphasis on critically informed analysis. The book skillfully explores diverse religious traditions and phenomena, providing readers with a comprehensive overview that encourages them to engage critically with the subject and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1901568"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1901568/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2a58b4613055d1a9ec685f3a7a20ade0</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited New Populism, New Conspiracism, and the Old Rhetoric of Purity in the group Historical theory and the philosophy of history</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1870636/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 03:00:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This entry investigates the connections between neo-populism and neo-conspiracism in the USA. One central thread is the rhetoric of purity that fosters rigid dichotomies of thought about identities, contributing to both populism and conspiracism, eliciting a neologism: conspirapopulism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0a2bb3adedfb24b3a9b663dec4e18718</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited New Populism, New Conspiracism, and the Old Rhetoric of Purity in the group Feminist Humanities</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1870635/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 03:00:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This entry investigates the connections between neo-populism and neo-conspiracism in the USA. One central thread is the rhetoric of purity that fosters rigid dichotomies of thought about identities, contributing to both populism and conspiracism, eliciting a neologism: conspirapopulism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">689435585d16bb5a7ab64abc4597c98d</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited New Populism, New Conspiracism, and the Old Rhetoric of Purity in the group Analytic Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1870634/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 03:00:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This entry investigates the connections between neo-populism and neo-conspiracism in the USA. One central thread is the rhetoric of purity that fosters rigid dichotomies of thought about identities, contributing to both populism and conspiracism, eliciting a neologism: conspirapopulism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9ef984eefd9e1ef542dde1ce5879c2d5</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Argumentation, Metaphor, and Analogy: It's Like Something Else in the group Analytic Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1870633/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 03:00:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A "good" arguer is like an architect with a penchant for civil and civic engineering. Such an arguer can design and present their reasons artfully about a variety of topics, as good architects do with a plenitude of structures and in various environments. Failures in this are rarely hidden for long, as poor constructions reveal themselves, often&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1870633"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1870633/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1b3fc6e802901cb46c023ae6e4ef9926</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited New Populism, New Conspiracism, and the Old Rhetoric of Purity</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1870618/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 21:22:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This entry investigates the connections between neo-populism and neo-conspiracism in the USA. One central thread is the rhetoric of purity that fosters rigid dichotomies of thought about identities, contributing to both populism and conspiracism, eliciting a neologism: conspirapopulism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2a343ec301189d6bcd2c432688747a77</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Argumentation, Metaphor, and Analogy: It's Like Something Else</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1870613/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2024 21:14:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A "good" arguer is like an architect with a penchant for civil and civic engineering. Such an arguer can design and present their reasons artfully about a variety of topics, as good architects do with a plenitude of structures and in various environments. Failures in this are rarely hidden for long, as poor constructions reveal themselves, often&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1870613"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1870613/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2a0cd904a69017c6fa17d44b69185269</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited The Philosophy of Humor: What Makes Something Funny in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1824196/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:24:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People can laugh at almost anything. What's the deal with that? What makes something funny? This essay reviews some theories of what it is for something to be funny. Each theory offers insights into this question, but no single approach provides a comprehensive answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5704828a80c475ced2a73b22b1cfb13e</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited The Philosophy of Humor: What Makes Something Funny in the group Film-Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1824195/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:24:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People can laugh at almost anything. What's the deal with that? What makes something funny? This essay reviews some theories of what it is for something to be funny. Each theory offers insights into this question, but no single approach provides a comprehensive answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4dbf3dcc72c6b86ca726e816528ca603</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited The Philosophy of Humor: What Makes Something Funny in the group Analytic Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1824194/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 02:24:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People can laugh at almost anything. What's the deal with that? What makes something funny? This essay reviews some theories of what it is for something to be funny. Each theory offers insights into this question, but no single approach provides a comprehensive answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5e99048fb7eb96f083c39a04b9b6ab9a</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited The Philosophy of Humor: What Makes Something Funny</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1824164/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People can laugh at almost anything. What's the deal with that? What makes something funny? This essay reviews some theories of what it is for something to be funny. Each theory offers insights into this question, but no single approach provides a comprehensive answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">522e067de79a37bd58e5180ffbc2c727</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816483/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 02:24:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1816483"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816483/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">358d45d25384f26cbc94ccd830debc8d</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816482/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 02:24:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1816482"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816482/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">564ed30ad4fb4493fbda2f108814f624</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor in the group Feminist Humanities</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816481/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 02:23:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1816481"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816481/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8b9c9a90e13311a43475a733adaf1096</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor in the group Analytic Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816480/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 02:23:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1816480"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816480/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8d52f473a9eaf8ab1c0d5e041940fe45</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor in the group African Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816479/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2022 02:23:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1816479"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816479/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">996e7192d21e9142c09eda5d400122f9</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816466/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2022 21:37:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1816466"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1816466/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d65f02ba9892e62d89b16a9333ae09ee</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Subversive Humor in the group Public Philosophy Journal</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745150/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 02:34:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I argue that an indirect and imaginative route through subversive humor offers a means to<br />
raise consciousness about covert oppression and the mechanisms underlying it, reveal the errors<br />
of those with power who complacently sustain systematic oppression, and even open those people<br />
up to changing their minds. Subversive humor confronts serious&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745150"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745150/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a04edafcc976a3eb1e79a253b5bc1565</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Subversive Humor in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745149/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 02:34:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I argue that an indirect and imaginative route through subversive humor offers a means to<br />
raise consciousness about covert oppression and the mechanisms underlying it, reveal the errors<br />
of those with power who complacently sustain systematic oppression, and even open those people<br />
up to changing their minds. Subversive humor confronts serious&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745149"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745149/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3e76d660577931aad94c29157c71a3b8</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Subversive Humor in the group Film-Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745148/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 02:34:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I argue that an indirect and imaginative route through subversive humor offers a means to<br />
raise consciousness about covert oppression and the mechanisms underlying it, reveal the errors<br />
of those with power who complacently sustain systematic oppression, and even open those people<br />
up to changing their minds. Subversive humor confronts serious&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745148"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745148/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bd5701ee2679ab9adb16564c3b417a33</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Subversive Humor in the group Feminist Humanities</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745147/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I argue that an indirect and imaginative route through subversive humor offers a means to<br />
raise consciousness about covert oppression and the mechanisms underlying it, reveal the errors<br />
of those with power who complacently sustain systematic oppression, and even open those people<br />
up to changing their minds. Subversive humor confronts serious&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745147"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745147/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8252178790aec466a15581e6f51b864f</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Subversive Humor in the group Analytic Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745146/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 02:33:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I argue that an indirect and imaginative route through subversive humor offers a means to<br />
raise consciousness about covert oppression and the mechanisms underlying it, reveal the errors<br />
of those with power who complacently sustain systematic oppression, and even open those people<br />
up to changing their minds. Subversive humor confronts serious&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745146"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745146/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">79dd6b1620bb3564f2b8ccde981d1784</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Dave Chappelle’s Civic Rhetoric: Positive Propaganda in a Liberal Democracy in the group Public Philosophy Journal</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745145/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 02:33:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of Dave Chappelle’s uses of storytelling about seemingly mundane events, like his experiences with his “white friend Chip” and the police, are examples of what W.E.B. Du Bois calls “Positive Propaganda.” This is in contrast to “Demagoguery,” the sort of propaganda described by Jason Stanley that obstructs empathic recognition of others, and u&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745145"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745145/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">aa6dc62895aa1089fca7c9a7835eb61e</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Dave Chappelle’s Civic Rhetoric: Positive Propaganda in a Liberal Democracy in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745144/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 02:33:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of Dave Chappelle’s uses of storytelling about seemingly mundane events, like his experiences with his “white friend Chip” and the police, are examples of what W.E.B. Du Bois calls “Positive Propaganda.” This is in contrast to “Demagoguery,” the sort of propaganda described by Jason Stanley that obstructs empathic recognition of others, and u&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745144"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745144/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f88b68ddc016fe875ec99d5c97679777</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Dave Chappelle’s Civic Rhetoric: Positive Propaganda in a Liberal Democracy in the group Film-Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745143/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 02:33:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of Dave Chappelle’s uses of storytelling about seemingly mundane events, like his experiences with his “white friend Chip” and the police, are examples of what W.E.B. Du Bois calls “Positive Propaganda.” This is in contrast to “Demagoguery,” the sort of propaganda described by Jason Stanley that obstructs empathic recognition of others, and u&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745143"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745143/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a109fed101db8fb296a1268a9bf60438</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Dave Chappelle’s Civic Rhetoric: Positive Propaganda in a Liberal Democracy in the group Feminist Humanities</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745142/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 02:33:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of Dave Chappelle’s uses of storytelling about seemingly mundane events, like his experiences with his “white friend Chip” and the police, are examples of what W.E.B. Du Bois calls “Positive Propaganda.” This is in contrast to “Demagoguery,” the sort of propaganda described by Jason Stanley that obstructs empathic recognition of others, and u&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745142"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745142/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9879fae4d12421c940dddb2b7bc53b54</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Dave Chappelle’s Civic Rhetoric: Positive Propaganda in a Liberal Democracy in the group African Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745141/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2021 02:33:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of Dave Chappelle’s uses of storytelling about seemingly mundane events, like his experiences with his “white friend Chip” and the police, are examples of what W.E.B. Du Bois calls “Positive Propaganda.” This is in contrast to “Demagoguery,” the sort of propaganda described by Jason Stanley that obstructs empathic recognition of others, and u&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745141"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745141/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9dc9e5280fb50c6ef5a834f703a7fab2</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Subversive Humor</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745075/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 17:23:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I argue that an indirect and imaginative route through subversive humor offers a means to<br />
raise consciousness about covert oppression and the mechanisms underlying it, reveal the errors<br />
of those with power who complacently sustain systematic oppression, and even open those people<br />
up to changing their minds. Subversive humor confronts serious&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745075"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745075/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2a16ea255c54992917552d7d40d93aa4</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Dave Chappelle’s Civic Rhetoric: Positive Propaganda in a Liberal Democracy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745074/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 17:11:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of Dave Chappelle’s uses of storytelling about seemingly mundane events, like his experiences with his “white friend Chip” and the police, are examples of what W.E.B. Du Bois calls “Positive Propaganda.” This is in contrast to “Demagoguery,” the sort of propaganda described by Jason Stanley that obstructs empathic recognition of others, and u&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1745074"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1745074/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">577c23fe9f6cd9bb9ee377ccdbc0ae36</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited The Playful Thought Experiments of Louis CK in the group Public Philosophy Journal</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743521/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:29:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is trivially true that comedians make jokes and thus are not serious; they are “just playing.” But watching Louis CK, especially his performances in Chewed Up, Shameless, and Hilarious, it is evident that he has more in mind than simply getting his audience to frivolously guffaw. I will make the case that this is so given the content of som&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743521"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743521/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bf04cf22943566e574227f7debb6fe9f</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited The Playful Thought Experiments of Louis CK in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743520/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:29:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is trivially true that comedians make jokes and thus are not serious; they are “just playing.” But watching Louis CK, especially his performances in Chewed Up, Shameless, and Hilarious, it is evident that he has more in mind than simply getting his audience to frivolously guffaw. I will make the case that this is so given the content of som&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743520"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743520/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bf04cf22943566e574227f7debb6fe9f</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited The Playful Thought Experiments of Louis CK in the group Film-Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743519/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:29:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is trivially true that comedians make jokes and thus are not serious; they are “just playing.” But watching Louis CK, especially his performances in Chewed Up, Shameless, and Hilarious, it is evident that he has more in mind than simply getting his audience to frivolously guffaw. I will make the case that this is so given the content of som&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743519"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743519/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5d3219668fb5aee805a974b184038b2b</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited The Playful Thought Experiments of Louis CK in the group Feminist Humanities</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743518/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:29:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is trivially true that comedians make jokes and thus are not serious; they are “just playing.” But watching Louis CK, especially his performances in Chewed Up, Shameless, and Hilarious, it is evident that he has more in mind than simply getting his audience to frivolously guffaw. I will make the case that this is so given the content of som&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743518"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743518/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">74861172d57b06463c12a82ee512b743</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited The Playful Thought Experiments of Louis CK in the group Analytic Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743517/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:29:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is trivially true that comedians make jokes and thus are not serious; they are “just playing.” But watching Louis CK, especially his performances in Chewed Up, Shameless, and Hilarious, it is evident that he has more in mind than simply getting his audience to frivolously guffaw. I will make the case that this is so given the content of som&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743517"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743517/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cb5fde815267f8752a3668be2d4f2a8a</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited A Wise Person Proportions their Beliefs With Humor in the group Public Philosophy Journal</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743516/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:29:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has proportion to do with humor or irony? And what do either of these have to do with being human? Jokes, laughter, and funniness connote excess, exaggeration, incongruity, dissonance, etc., the opposite of proportion--balance, symmetry, Aristotle’s golden mean. Yet, The Philosopher maintains, the wit has found the ideal moderate position b&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743516"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743516/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8fe1523e68242f07c9f2be375cc41f96</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited A Wise Person Proportions their Beliefs With Humor in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743515/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:29:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has proportion to do with humor or irony? And what do either of these have to do with being human? Jokes, laughter, and funniness connote excess, exaggeration, incongruity, dissonance, etc., the opposite of proportion--balance, symmetry, Aristotle’s golden mean. Yet, The Philosopher maintains, the wit has found the ideal moderate position b&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743515"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743515/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f8b7296a7e947088488b49961f441e59</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited A Wise Person Proportions their Beliefs With Humor in the group Feminist Humanities</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743514/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:28:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has proportion to do with humor or irony? And what do either of these have to do with being human? Jokes, laughter, and funniness connote excess, exaggeration, incongruity, dissonance, etc., the opposite of proportion--balance, symmetry, Aristotle’s golden mean. Yet, The Philosopher maintains, the wit has found the ideal moderate position b&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743514"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743514/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">218ca6591be1b4c485726d1954d8790e</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited A Wise Person Proportions their Beliefs With Humor in the group Ancient Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743513/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:28:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has proportion to do with humor or irony? And what do either of these have to do with being human? Jokes, laughter, and funniness connote excess, exaggeration, incongruity, dissonance, etc., the opposite of proportion--balance, symmetry, Aristotle’s golden mean. Yet, The Philosopher maintains, the wit has found the ideal moderate position b&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743513"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743513/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">27504d72f955ea7ae9e2f4dec3cb9c3f</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor in the group Public Philosophy Journal</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743512/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:28:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743512"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743512/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">27504d72f955ea7ae9e2f4dec3cb9c3f</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor in the group Film-Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743511/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:28:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743511"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743511/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ee2dd67a4dd6447173bde6270986e9bc</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor in the group Feminist Humanities</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743510/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:28:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743510"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743510/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">72770f7b5c86610e97b4b9ff0156ba65</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor in the group Analytic Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743509/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:28:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743509"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743509/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">05d68471d2e00b603feb398c5977429b</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor in the group African Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743508/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:28:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743508"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743508/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fd78d8ad27913525cde1ebcf8ff78bb2</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited The Playful Thought Experiments of Louis CK</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743453/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:10:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is trivially true that comedians make jokes and thus are not serious; they are “just playing.” But watching Louis CK, especially his performances in Chewed Up, Shameless, and Hilarious, it is evident that he has more in mind than simply getting his audience to frivolously guffaw. I will make the case that this is so given the content of som&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743453"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743453/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">47f462ccfb8c12455e8c6a1567ce9519</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited A Wise Person Proportions their Beliefs With Humor</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743452/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:00:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has proportion to do with humor or irony? And what do either of these have to do with being human? Jokes, laughter, and funniness connote excess, exaggeration, incongruity, dissonance, etc., the opposite of proportion--balance, symmetry, Aristotle’s golden mean. Yet, The Philosopher maintains, the wit has found the ideal moderate position b&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743452"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743452/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2215536c86f05c7dcb1bdfad882be01f</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited Is Laughing at Morally Oppressive Jokes Like Being Disgusted by Phony Dog Feces? An Analysis of Belief and Alief in the Context of Questionable Humor</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743451/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2021 21:50:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two very influential papers from 2008, Tamar Gendler introduced the concept of “alief” to describe the mental state one is in when acting in ways contrary to their consciously professed beliefs. For example, if asked to eat what they know is fudge, but shaped into the form of dog feces, they will hesitate, and behave in a manner that would be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1743451"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1743451/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4c7a9bf55c23ec99ba6fec2605f26504</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited How Socratic was Swift's Irony? in the group Public Philosophy Journal</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1741639/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:27:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Swift correct that “reasoning will never make a man correct an ill opinion, which by reasoning he never acquired” (Letter to a Young Gentleman)? If so, what recourse is there to change attitudes especially among those who continue to fervently believe unjustified claims and act upon them in a way that affects other people? I will answer the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1741639"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1741639/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d04f3284324e6f3961f1958435c45c08</guid>
				<title>Chris A. Kramer deposited How Socratic was Swift's Irony? in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1741638/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 02:27:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was Swift correct that “reasoning will never make a man correct an ill opinion, which by reasoning he never acquired” (Letter to a Young Gentleman)? If so, what recourse is there to change attitudes especially among those who continue to fervently believe unjustified claims and act upon them in a way that affects other people? I will answer the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1741638"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1741638/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>