<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>STEM Ed+ Commons | D. Gregory MacIsaac | Activity</title>
	<link>https://stemedplus.hcommons.org/members/dgmacisaac/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://stemedplus.hcommons.org/members/dgmacisaac/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for D. Gregory MacIsaac.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:31:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=10.6.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3b055c3de3637ab581c7e25dbbda9fae</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1915781/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:36:16 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8a12652357cdff5d0a4a514e816e7951</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1910871/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 21:37:24 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ba7ec5295f019b3d9b7c3b478675d8ee</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The False Appearance of the Sophist Himself in the First Six Definitions of Plato’s Sophist in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1900002/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2024 03:06:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to how the definitions in Sophist fit together is the seventh definition, the maker of false appearances. The first six definitions are a false appearance of the sophist himself, as a businessman who sells an art of disputation to rich young men. Because this is a deception, to unmask him we need to supplement the brief descriptions in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1900002"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1900002/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">98558c7a06de4a631b8c0122fd0da89d</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The False Appearance of the Sophist Himself in the First Six Definitions of Plato’s Sophist in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1900001/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2024 03:05:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to how the definitions in Sophist fit together is the seventh definition, the maker of false appearances. The first six definitions are a false appearance of the sophist himself, as a businessman who sells an art of disputation to rich young men. Because this is a deception, to unmask him we need to supplement the brief descriptions in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1900001"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1900001/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c5dfdfd35ca50224c1519db8a218c6e0</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The False Appearance of the Sophist Himself in the First Six Definitions of Plato’s Sophist in the group Ancient Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1900000/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2024 03:05:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to how the definitions in Sophist fit together is the seventh definition, the maker of false appearances. The first six definitions are a false appearance of the sophist himself, as a businessman who sells an art of disputation to rich young men. Because this is a deception, to unmask him we need to supplement the brief descriptions in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1900000"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1900000/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d0663fb8a313752cb4839d6aa5c4a924</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The False Appearance of the Sophist Himself in the First Six Definitions of Plato’s Sophist</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1899914/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:11:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key to how the definitions in Sophist fit together is the seventh definition, the maker of false appearances. The first six definitions are a false appearance of the sophist himself, as a businessman who sells an art of disputation to rich young men. Because this is a deception, to unmask him we need to supplement the brief descriptions in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1899914"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1899914/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">864f0cb241688e0fe53383bb55376daf</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1896007/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 01:24:48 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">edb5b89454ba91fa0cbafddf4deae8a3</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Plato’s Account of Eleaticism: A New Interpretation of Parmenides in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1837736/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 02:23:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I propose a new interpretation of Plato’s Parmenides. I avoid the assumption of Developmentalism, that Plato is criticising his own ‘middle’ theory of forms. Instead, I read the dialogue as Plato’s serious presentation of the Eleatic position. He shows that Eleatics’s counterintuitive thesis follows from the fundamental assumption of qualitati&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1837736"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1837736/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9c6b4d41242042650ef9fd42a857b4fe</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Plato’s Account of Eleaticism: A New Interpretation of Parmenides in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1837735/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 02:23:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I propose a new interpretation of Plato’s Parmenides. I avoid the assumption of Developmentalism, that Plato is criticising his own ‘middle’ theory of forms. Instead, I read the dialogue as Plato’s serious presentation of the Eleatic position. He shows that Eleatics’s counterintuitive thesis follows from the fundamental assumption of qualitati&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1837735"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1837735/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">032837f0e83a0dc84029877d42909dd4</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Plato’s Account of Eleaticism: A New Interpretation of Parmenides in the group Ancient Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1837734/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 02:23:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I propose a new interpretation of Plato’s Parmenides. I avoid the assumption of Developmentalism, that Plato is criticising his own ‘middle’ theory of forms. Instead, I read the dialogue as Plato’s serious presentation of the Eleatic position. He shows that Eleatics’s counterintuitive thesis follows from the fundamental assumption of qualitati&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1837734"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1837734/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">87525ab658b8f56636e8b574a6f8f57f</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1837718/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d6ce52a53b32275c850cf5c9361dba85</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Plato’s Account of Eleaticism: A New Interpretation of Parmenides</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1837522/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 18:47:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I propose a new interpretation of Plato’s Parmenides. I avoid the assumption of Developmentalism, that Plato is criticising his own ‘middle’ theory of forms. Instead, I read the dialogue as Plato’s serious presentation of the Eleatic position. He shows that Eleatics’s counterintuitive thesis follows from the fundamental assumption of qualitati&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1837522"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1837522/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bc979f6aa18d8ffa0f0651c62afae04f</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Deﬁciencies of the Presocratic Material Elements and the Dream Theory in Theaetetus in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1785195/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:23:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dream Theory in Theaetetus is Plato's generalised account of Presocratic elements. Evidence for this given from Laws, Phaedo, Timaeus, and through a comparison with Aristotle's account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d0c8b2fcf1722e617ceb2f46506f8624</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Deﬁciencies of the Presocratic Material Elements and the Dream Theory in Theaetetus in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1785194/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:23:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dream Theory in Theaetetus is Plato's generalised account of Presocratic elements. Evidence for this given from Laws, Phaedo, Timaeus, and through a comparison with Aristotle's account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7e213b4ce7c037450a2c80c84f3e59a0</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Deﬁciencies of the Presocratic Material Elements and the Dream Theory in Theaetetus in the group Ancient Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1785193/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2022 02:23:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dream Theory in Theaetetus is Plato's generalised account of Presocratic elements. Evidence for this given from Laws, Phaedo, Timaeus, and through a comparison with Aristotle's account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4ea74835522b43997b37f8d20d39f0db</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Deﬁciencies of the Presocratic Material Elements and the Dream Theory in Theaetetus</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1785138/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dream Theory in Theaetetus is Plato's generalised account of Presocratic elements. Evidence for this given from Laws, Phaedo, Timaeus, and through a comparison with Aristotle's account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8b871a983d471cfc6c5de33314023340</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac started the topic Ancient Philosophy Events Calendar in the discussion Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/groups/philosophy/forum/topic/ancient-philosophy-events-calendar-2/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:06:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A calendar of Ancient Philosophy Events: <a href="https://endoxa.blog/ancient-philosophy-calendar/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://endoxa.blog/ancient-philosophy-calendar/</a></p>
<p>A calendar of Calls for Papers: <a href="https://endoxa.blog/cfps-calendar/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://endoxa.blog/cfps-calendar/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f4517bfde9d241ac0e6bfec8d1dd1a1e</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac started the topic Ancient Philosophy Events Calendar in the discussion Ancient Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/groups/ancient-philosophy/forum/topic/ancient-philosophy-events-calendar/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A calendar of Ancient Philosophy Events: <a href="https://endoxa.blog/ancient-philosophy-calendar/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://endoxa.blog/ancient-philosophy-calendar/</a></p>
<p>A calendar of Calls for Papers: <a href="https://endoxa.blog/cfps-calendar/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://endoxa.blog/cfps-calendar/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">819cd3370c97d6c91e6af87afa05f249</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited On Proclus as a Platonic Exegete in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1775527/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 02:23:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A response to John Finamore, “The Divided Line and the Cave in Proclus' Republic Commentary.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f915821d7a77f66c13dacc9a43fecb4f</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited On Proclus as a Platonic Exegete in the group Ancient Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1775526/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 02:23:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A response to John Finamore, “The Divided Line and the Cave in Proclus' Republic Commentary.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0d5694ac86ef0be616c36cfaac1d26a4</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited On Proclus as a Platonic Exegete</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1775446/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 14:00:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A response to John Finamore, “The Divided Line and the Cave in Proclus' Republic Commentary.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">16320f2547a0f361fe737272364806d6</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1771807/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 19:31:03 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c0ed98aac44cf880a9c93451a6af4e59</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Role of the Digression on the Man of the Law Courts and the Philosopher (172b-177c) in the Argument of Theaetetus in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1726475/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2021 02:31:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interpretations of the Theaetetus digression fail to see how it functions in Plato’s argument because they have taken its praise of the philosopher at face value. But this is not the philosopher from Republic. His otherworldliness reflects both Theodorus’ mathematical understanding of philosophy as the study of ‘divine’ objects and the judgeme&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1726475"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1726475/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dec52bd48daf993c9a2a8769c91aee2a</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Role of the Digression on the Man of the Law Courts and the Philosopher (172b-177c) in the Argument of Theaetetus in the group Ancient Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1726474/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2021 02:31:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interpretations of the Theaetetus digression fail to see how it functions in Plato’s argument because they have taken its praise of the philosopher at face value. But this is not the philosopher from Republic. His otherworldliness reflects both Theodorus’ mathematical understanding of philosophy as the study of ‘divine’ objects and the judgeme&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1726474"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1726474/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1034166e4cf6ff734a21cd285aab6d53</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Role of the Digression on the Man of the Law Courts and the Philosopher (172b-177c) in the Argument of Theaetetus</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1726451/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2021 19:13:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interpretations of the Theaetetus digression fail to see how it functions in Plato’s argument because they have taken its praise of the philosopher at face value. But this is not the philosopher from Republic. His otherworldliness reflects both Theodorus’ mathematical understanding of philosophy as the study of ‘divine’ objects and the judgeme&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1726451"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1726451/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6eb9d74d0f347073d263228bc00e6bcd</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Review of Stephen Gersh, Neoplatonism after Derrida. Parallelograms. in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680635/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:26:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Review of: Neoplatonism after Derrida. Parallelograms. By Stephen Gersh. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 2006. Pp. xv + 223. $147.00 (cloth). ISBN 9789004151550.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">33018a56e4048ee34fa30e341b252b1e</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Review: (M.) Martijn, Proclus on Nature. Philosophy of Nature and its Methods in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680634/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:26:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Review: (M.) Martijn Proclus on Nature. Philosophy of Nature and its Methods in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Pp. x + 360. £105. 978900-4181915 The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dc76bda1f10cfaace96bb9b7909a9d30</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Platonic Deconstruction: A Review Essay of Stephen Gersh's Neoplatonism After Derrida in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680633/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:26:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neoplatonism after Derrida is a significant study of the history of philosophy, and covers ground rarely explored before, in an extremely thorough, fruitful, and persuasive manner. However, it poses serious interpretive problems for the reader. It presents an extremely detailed and complex analysis of both Neoplatonism and Derridean&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680633"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680633/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6976a4667db4264d13bc0172c3583918</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Geometrical First Principles in Proclus’ Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680632/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:26:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his commentary on Euclid, Proclus says both that the first principle of geometry are self-evident and that they are hypotheses received from the single, highest, unhypo- thetical science, which is probably dialectic. The implication of this seems to be that a geometer both does and does not know geometrical truths. This dilemma only exists if&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680632"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680632/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bd16a54a4cd8d1fa7dd64017fab06bae</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Non enim ab hiis que sensus est iudicare sensum. Sensation and Thought in Theaetetus, Plotinus and Proclus in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680631/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:26:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I examine the relation between sensation and discursive thought (dianoia) in Plato, Plotinus, and Proclus. In Theaetetus, a soul whose highest faculty was sensation would have no unified experience of the sensible world, lacking universal ideas to give order to the sensible flux. It is implied that such universals are grasped by the soul’s t&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680631"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680631/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0a0cda10785c87b6b92d16c51615d0ee</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Philosophy as the Exegesis of ‘Sacred’ Texts in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680630/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:26:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to his Cratylus commentary Proclus thinks that, although an oracle or a poet is the customary promulgator of a divine name, it is the philosopher who is the authoritative interpreter of that divine name. The reason for this is that the philosopher has the same access to the source of revelation as does the oracle or the poet, because the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680630"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680630/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">32d5dabb0a1409ecc9442b7b7ac2631a</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Nous of the Partial Soul in Proclus’ Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680629/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:26:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this paper I will examine Proclus’ Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato in order to shed light on his doctrine of the partial soul’s nous. Proclus’ epistemology is in many ways the heart of his system. The human soul is a microcosm, and because each of its faculties corresponds to one or other order of the macrocosm, the soul’s knowled&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680629"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680629/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8d6b9d1cfc4455243ddf46b3c81cbf8e</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Nous of the Partial Soul in Proclus’ Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680628/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:25:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this paper I will examine Proclus’ Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato in order to shed light on his doctrine of the partial soul’s nous. Proclus’ epistemology is in many ways the heart of his system. The human soul is a microcosm, and because each of its faculties corresponds to one or other order of the macrocosm, the soul’s knowled&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680628"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680628/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bfb02c86a429c56658faf6866de0707d</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Noesis, dialectique et mathématiques dans le Commentaire aux Éléments d’Euclide de Proclus in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680627/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:25:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On pourrait avoir l’impression que dans l’interprétation de Proclus de la ligne divisée de Platon, il y a deux types de connaissance des objets supérieurs : une noêsis ascendante qui monte jusqu’au principe anhypothétique, et dont les objets sont les eidê simples, et une dianoia qui inclut les mathématiques, dont le mouvement est descendant e&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680627"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680627/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">914a7ba09fa6618e70502e3e57ae0268</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Soul and the Virtues in Proclus’ Commentary on the Republic of Plato in the group Political Philosophy &#38; Theory</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680626/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:25:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 7th essay of his Commentary on the Republic of Plato, Proclus supplies the elements of a fairly robust Neoplatonic political philosophy. In general he agrees with Plato’s account of the tripartite soul and the four cardinal virtues, while introducing important nuances into the theory. The idea of the dominance of one part of the soul over a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680626"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680626/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d8b77fc6663802cc344a49e4d3fc19ab</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Soul and the Virtues in Proclus’ Commentary on the Republic of Plato in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680625/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 7th essay of his Commentary on the Republic of Plato, Proclus supplies the elements of a fairly robust Neoplatonic political philosophy. In general he agrees with Plato’s account of the tripartite soul and the four cardinal virtues, while introducing important nuances into the theory. The idea of the dominance of one part of the soul over a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680625"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680625/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3cdcdc81190bf9d71cb65f2dec4c9a68</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Origin of Determination in the Neoplatonism of Proclus in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680624/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:25:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philosophy has as its task not only the discovery of the determinations into which all things fall, but also the explanation of how these determinations arise. In Proclus we may distinguish three related sorts of deter- minations. First, there are the determinations which emerge within any given taxis in the hierarchy of all things and which may&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680624"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680624/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fa4bd5b4f2eb9d8c5c78e4512cd8d57d</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Neoplatonism and the Hegelianism of James Doull in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680623/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:25:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this study I will show how Neoplatonism is not properly understood as a moment within the Hegelian dialectic. The Hegelian analysis obscures both the true character of the Neoplatonic One, ￼and the Neoplatonic account of the relation between thought and its object, because it treats these positions as deficient versions of itself. We must r&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680623"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680623/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">167bb38a189d276d3bf24699f8cd4180</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Projection and Time in Proclus in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680621/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:25:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Proclus philosophical system is expressed in dianoetic terms. Thus while Proclus is a systematic thinker, the terms in which his system is written themselves fall short of the reality which they seek to express. Moreover, because dianoia is a thinking which never has a complete grasp on its object, the Procline system must be considered to be&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680621"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680621/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ea5fa04777ed332776bfad1d6a9150bc</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Phantasia between Soul and Body in Proclus' Euclid Commentary in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680620/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:25:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proclus discusses imagination (phantasia) in the second prologue to his Euclid commentary. In his discussion, he describes phantasia in terms which make it seem like a passive screen, onto which geometrical figures are projected. However, he also speaks of phantasia in this text in terms which make it seem active, as if it were the projector&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680620"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680620/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3cdcd19d28384a692d733935c8fe66df</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Final Section of Proclus' Commentary on the Parmenides: A Greek Retroversion of the Latin Translation in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680619/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:25:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reconstruction of the Greek text of the final part of Proclus' Commentary on the Parmenides, from the extant Latin, by Carlos Steel and Friedrich Rumbach, with an English translation by D. Gregory MacIsaac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b214e417039a10e093e221055a62bb53</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Soul and Discursive Reason in the Philosophy of Proclus in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680618/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Proclus dianoia is the Soul's thinking activity, through which it makes itself into a divided image of Nous. Dianoia's thoughts are logoi, because in the Greek philosophical tradition, logos came to mean a division of a prior unity (ch.I). Proclus' theory of dianoia rejects induction, and is a conscious development of Plato's theory of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680618"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680618/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6caa07c22f06fb2f273c9d9e1ac8880e</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680503/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 06:43:31 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ccd36fa358953ee84564402c16d1820c</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Review of Stephen Gersh, Neoplatonism after Derrida. Parallelograms.</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680494/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 21:04:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Review of: Neoplatonism after Derrida. Parallelograms. By Stephen Gersh. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 2006. Pp. xv + 223. $147.00 (cloth). ISBN 9789004151550.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f4e825ddaac2051156ed7c9af26d6883</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Review: (M.) Martijn, Proclus on Nature. Philosophy of Nature and its Methods in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato's Timaeus.</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680493/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:59:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Review: (M.) Martijn Proclus on Nature. Philosophy of Nature and its Methods in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato's Timaeus. Leiden: Brill, 2010. Pp. x + 360. £105. 978900-4181915<br />
The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3030c0977e5900ae247ae02bba37c2b3</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Platonic Deconstruction: A Review Essay of Stephen Gersh's Neoplatonism After Derrida</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680492/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neoplatonism after Derrida is a significant study of the history of philosophy, and covers ground rarely explored before, in an extremely thorough, fruitful, and persuasive manner.  However, it poses serious interpretive problems for the reader.  It presents an extremely detailed and complex analysis of both Neoplatonism and Derridean&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680492"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680492/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d014302a61cfc94e1b6dbac12212c74c</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Geometrical First Principles in Proclus’ Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680490/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:46:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his commentary on Euclid, Proclus says both that the first principle of geometry are self-evident and that they are hypotheses received from the single, highest, unhypo- thetical science, which is probably dialectic. The implication of this seems to be that a geometer both does and does not know geometrical truths. This dilemma only exists if&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680490"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680490/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ad11ffb7b648d008326af213f17f97f4</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Non enim ab hiis que sensus est iudicare sensum. Sensation and Thought in Theaetetus, Plotinus and Proclus</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680488/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:43:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I examine the relation between sensation and discursive thought (dianoia) in Plato, Plotinus, and Proclus. In Theaetetus, a soul whose highest faculty was sensation would have no unified experience of the sensible world, lacking universal ideas to give order to the sensible flux. It is implied that such universals are grasped by the soul’s t&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680488"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680488/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e4441aca41319d23c45ca2c25eb99912</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited Philosophy as the Exegesis of ‘Sacred’ Texts</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680487/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:37:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to his Cratylus commentary Proclus thinks that, although an oracle or a poet is the customary promulgator of a divine name, it is the philosopher who is the authoritative interpreter of that divine name. The reason for this is that the philosopher has the same access to the source of revelation as does the oracle or the poet, because the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680487"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680487/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">531664bd8479543ac442ad643f1acda0</guid>
				<title>D. Gregory MacIsaac deposited The Nous of the Partial Soul in Proclus’ Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680486/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:32:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this paper I will examine Proclus’ Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato in order to shed light on his doctrine of the partial soul’s nous. Proclus’ epistemology is in many ways the heart of his system. The human soul is a microcosm, and because each of its faculties corresponds to one or other order of the macrocosm, the soul’s knowled&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1680486"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1680486/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>